Ethnic Bulgaria.

July 7, 2006

Volunteers do not end up in their sites by accidents.  Peace Corps asks us what kind of place we want to live, and then they try to match us as best they can to the available sites who have requested a volunteer.  My requests were: I wanted my own classroom (it’s common for teachers to move from class to class, while the students remain in the room; I wanted my own room so I could decorate it), I wanted a town bigger than 2000 people, and I wanted to live someplace multiethnic. Bulgaria does not have a homogenous population.  Most people consider themselves to be “ethnic Bulgarian”, whatever that means.  (Since the Bulgarian population is a mixture of the original Slavic inhabitants and Turkish invaders from Western China, thousands of years ago, people who claim to be ethnic Bulgarian can be blonde or dark or anything in between.)  The two largest minority groups are the Turkish and the Roma.  The Turkish are Bulgarian citizens, but would never call themselves Bulgarian – they’re Turkish. They’re mostly Muslims.  The Roma sometimes call themselves Turkish as well, and are either Muslim or Christian.  There are no strict lines with ethnicity and religion; there are Pomacks (ethnic Bulgarian Muslims), too.  I’m still working on getting a handle on all of this.  I can’t tell who’s Turkish and who’s Bulgarian, but the Roma are pretty easily distinguishable – they’re very obviously of Indian origin. In Boboshevo, almost everyone is ethnic Bulgarian and Christian.  There are, I think, two Roma kids in the school.  But Pavel Banya is a more diverse place and I’m a little confused. I see a lot of older women wearing what appear to be headcarves.  They don’t look like the headscarves I was used to seeing in Chicago.  Rather, they just look like kerchiefs, tied under their necks.  If I had never been anywhere else in Bulgaria, I’d think it was a Bulgarian thing, but because I never saw anyone wearing these in Boboshevo, I wonder if the women are Muslims.  I know there are Turkish villages around Pavel Banya, but I don’t know if these women are Turkish or not.  They could be Pomacks. Now, the Roma.  I’ve heard the plight of the Roma compared to African Americans in the US, but in my opinion, this is a faulty analogy – the Roma are in a <I>much</I> worse situation.  It is perfectly socially acceptable to openly discriminate against them.  (One of my classmates told me this anecdote: when he visited his site for the first time, his counterpart told him that there was another volunteer in their town, working with Roma kids.  She – the counterpart – then said “If you help her, I won’t be your friend.”)  There are a number of superstitions, like, “If you sing at the table, you’ll marry a gypsy”.  Nice!  In theory, the schools are integrated, but in practice, there are still Roma schools and Bulgarian schools.  Even in more integrated schools, Roma kids often don’t have textbooks or class materials.  I have been informed by volunteers who work with the Roma that their culture doesn’t value education very highly (they value having a good time in the present, and don’t worry about long term planning), and most girls drop out of school at 8th grade or so, to get married. Needless to say, there are very few images – positive or not – of the Roma in the Bulgarian media.  With one exception: <A HREF=”http://azisfens.hit.bg/azisb.jpg”>Azic!</A>  Azic probably requires his very own entry.  Next time.

2 Responses to “Ethnic Bulgaria.”

  1. vessie Says:

    “Since the Bulgarian population is a mixture of the original Slavic inhabitants and Turkish invaders from Western China” – you should be more informed about bulgarian mixture and why they are bulgarians, not only slavic and turkish. Maybe you missed your PC history lesson about Bulgarian state on Balkan peninsula, but there were also other states: The Great Old Bulgaria and Volga Bulgaria. I hope you will be iteresting in that. Greetings from Doupnitsa

  2. dobri Says:

    The Bulgarian population is a mixture of Thrace, Slavs and Bulgars. Thrace are pretty much the oldest, still distinguishable, people on the Balkan peninsula, Slavs are usually blue eyed and blond haired. As for Bulgars or proto-Bulgarians – they are not Turkish, at best turkic (there’s a sharp difference) and that’s an Encyclopedia Britanica kind of thing, thats only based on similarities between the original Bulgars’ language (of which almost nothing is left) and turkic languages of the times. The culture of the Bulgars was way too advanced, compared to any other(?) turkic tribe(?), in fact to any european one, except for Greek and Roman (well, Greece did not exist at the moment, so we’re really left only with the Roman). Well, and the Thrace, altho Thrace were part of the Roman Empire at the moment, also. So there is no connection between Bulgars and Turkic peoples of the times, except for the language, that’s not really turkic either. And that can easily be written as cultural influence, rather than origin. No one knows where the Bulgars came from up until now, and now no one knows that either, including Britanica. You can distinguish between “Ethnic Bulgarians” and Turks by the color of the skin and the facial features, I’m sorry if it sounds racist but it’s really that obvious :D The kerchief thing is muslim, I’ve never heard of Boboshevo, as for the Turks and the Gypsies – they’ve always had the opportunities the Bulgarians has but they’ve almost never used them.

    If you want to know why you can not trust Britanica on this one – look at the Berlin Congress of 1878, the liberation of Bulgaria, the Russo-Turkish wars and the borders and history of The First and The Second Bulgarian Empire.


Leave a Reply